Defensible, Network-Scale Reduction of Excavation Risk in Safety-Critical Infrastructure
Satellite-Enhanced Excavation Intelligence
Excavation damage is the leading cause of safety incidents, service disruption, and regulatory exposure in pipeline and other complex networks.
KartaSoft gives damage prevention teams independent visibility into both declared and undeclared excavation activity, before incidents occur, not after.
Independently Validated
Used by Fortune 500 Companies
Supports Regulatory and Audit Review
Physics-Informed Methodology
Increasing excavation density and regulatory demand have outpaced conventional damage prevention programs
Damage prevention was designed around declared excavations and procedural compliance. Ticketing systems, patrols, and alarms remain essential. However, they were not built to prioritize across thousands of concurrent excavations, or to detect activity where no ticket was filed.
The result: damage prevention programs that are high in activity but uneven in risk discrimination, with most exposure identified only after damage has already occurred.
What Tickets Provide
Declared dig polygon
Excavator identity and type
Construction classification
Stated timeframe
What They Do Not Provide
Confirmation that excavation occurred
Actual ground disturbance location
Within-polygon risk variation
Visibility into unticketed activity
Risk Management and Damage Prevention for Excavation Activities
Two coordinated layers for a unified integrated risk picture
KartaSoft adds an independent analytical layer over existing damage prevention workflows without replacing them.
It operates across both declared and undeclared excavation simultaneously.
Excavation Risk Score for Ticketed Activities
- Real-time scoring on likelihood of strike and severity
- Sub-ticket geospatial risk heat mapping
- Behavioural risk weighting by excavator history
- Network-wide prioritization queue surfaced in GIS
- Interpretable reason codes
Satellite Detection for Unticketed Activities
- Satellite-detected ground disturbance near pipeline corridors
- Radar and optical imagery, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2
- Asset proximity risk scoring for each candidate
- High-resolution follow-up on most credible detections
- Early escalation flags before SCADA or physical alarm
The model is trained on the operator's own historical ticket and damage data — excavator history, pipeline characteristics, audit records, critical facility proximity, and encroachment history. It is engineered as a non-intrusive overlay on existing GIS and asset management environments.
A Defensible Economic Model for Excavation Risk
KartaSoft Excavation Intelligence reduces excavation-driven incidents, financial loss, and regulatory exposure by shifting intervention earlier and targeting effort where risk is material.
1. Operational Cost Stability
Earlier intervention shifts cost curves
By identifying elevated excavation risk before SCADA alarms or asset damage:
- Emergency repairs shift to planned work
- Crew overtime and call-outs are reduced
- Damage is addressed before escalation
Economic Impact
Economic Impact
2. Field Efficiency & Workforce Safety
Risk-based prioritization reduces wasted field effort
Today, many excavation alerts lack asset-specific risk context, forcing field teams to investigate broadly.
KartaSoft ranks excavation activity by actual asset exposure and consequence, focusing crews only where intervention materially reduces risk.
3. Recovery Economics & Claims Defensibility
Evidence strengthens third-party cost recovery
Where damage occurs, the system provides time-stamped, spatial evidence to support attribution and claims, all without changing existing recovery processes.
Economic Impact
Economic Impact
4. Capital Efficiency & Asset Strategy
Persistent excavation pressure informs capital decisions
Repeated excavation pressure creates a hidden degradation risk. By identifying recurring exposure patterns:
- Capital replacement can be targeted
- Asset renewal is prioritised where risk persists
- Deferred CapEx decisions carry higher confidence
Outputs are auditable, repeatable, and suitable for regulatory and internal review
Review excavation risk exposure in your network
Confidential, non-binding discussion focused on risk diligence