Defensible, Network-Scale Reduction of Excavation Risk in Safety-Critical Infrastructure

Satellite-Based Excavation Intelligence

Excavation damage is the leading cause of safety incidents, service disruption, and regulatory exposure in pipeline and other complex networks.

KartaSoft identifies high-risk excavation activity before alarms, asset damage, or third-party incidents, enabling earlier intervention, lower emergency response costs, and defensible operational and investment decisions.

Independently Validated

Used by Fortune 500 Companies

Supports Regulatory and Audit Review

Physics-Informed Methodology

Increasing excavation density and regulatory scrutiny have outpaced legacy controls

Excavation Occurs in Two Contexts:

1. Declared excavation

2. Undeclared excavation

Despite ticketing systems, patrols, and alarms, most excavation-related risk is identified only after damage occurs.

Non-ticketed activity, broad alerts, and limited prioritization force operators into reactive response cycles with high cost and limited recovery.

Risk Management for Ticketed Excavation Activities

What Tickets Provide

  • Declared dig polygon

  • Excavator identity and type

  • Construction classification

  • Stated timeframe

What They Do Not Provide

  • Actual ground disturbance location

  • Within-polygon risk variation

  • Behavioural risk weighting

  • Network-wide prioritization

How KartaSoft Enhances Risk Management

Sub-ticket geospatial risk heat mapping

Behavioural risk modelling by excavator history

Asset density + consequence modelling

Network-level prioritization queue

Risk Management for Non-Ticketed Excavation Activities

Common in:

Small municipalities

Resource-constrained contractors

Regions where penalties are lower than compliance costs

How KartaSoft Provides New Visibility

Satellite-detected disturbance alerts

Asset proximity risk scoring

Early escalation flags

A Defensible Economic Model for Excavation Risk

KartaSoft Excavation Intelligence reduces excavation-driven incidents, financial loss, and regulatory exposure by shifting intervention earlier and targeting effort where risk is material.

1. Operational Cost Stability

Earlier intervention shifts cost curves

By identifying elevated excavation risk before SCADA alarms or asset damage:

  • Emergency repairs shift to planned work
  • Crew overtime and call-outs are reduced
  • Damage is addressed before escalation

Economic Impact

Augmented
Reduce cost per incident
Reduce Opex volatility
Reduce network disruption costs

 

Economic Impact

Augmented
Fewer low-value site visits
Better utilization of skilled labour
Reduced fatigue and safety exposure

 

2. Field Efficiency & Workforce Safety

Risk-based prioritization reduces wasted field effort

Today, many excavation alerts lack asset-specific risk context, forcing field teams to investigate broadly.
KartaSoft ranks excavation activity by actual asset exposure and consequence, focusing crews only where intervention materially reduces risk.

3. Recovery Economics & Claims Defensibility

Evidence strengthens third-party cost recovery

Where damage occurs, the system provides time-stamped, spatial evidence to support attribution and claims, all without changing existing recovery processes.

Economic Impact

Augmented
Improved recovery rates
Reduced dispute duration
Lower write-offs

 

Economic Impact

Augmented
Better capital efficiency
Extended asset life
Reduced over-investment

 

4. Capital Efficiency & Asset Strategy

Persistent excavation pressure informs capital decisions

Repeated excavation pressure creates a hidden degradation risk. By identifying recurring exposure patterns:

  • Capital replacement can be targeted
  • Asset renewal is prioritised where risk persists
  • Deferred CapEx decisions carry higher confidence

Outputs are auditable, repeatable, and suitable for regulatory and internal review

Review excavation risk exposure in your network

Confidential, non-binding discussion focused on risk diligence

Protected Intellectual Property