Operational Intelligence for Critical Infrastructure
Your systems already hold much of the evidence.
KartaSoft connects operational, asset, spatial, inspection, and field data to show where changing conditions and consequences converge, so teams can focus limited attention with a clear, reviewable basis for why.

The answer is already in your fragmented data.
Bring it to light with KartaSoft.
See how KartaSoft works
You can have all the data and still miss what matters
SCADA shows operating conditions. GIS shows location. Asset, inspection, ticketing, and field systems each hold another part of the picture.
The difficult work begins when those signals have to be interpreted together. A pressure change, new corridor activity, or a deteriorating asset can mean very different things depending on how the system is operating and what is exposed.
Meanwhile, engineering and field capacity are finite.
Which conditions deserve attention first, and why?

The Missing Operational Intelligence Layer
Experienced engineers reconcile the evidence
Their judgment is essential, but manual review takes time and becomes difficult to apply consistently across a large network.
Rules, thresholds, and established software process information at scale
They are effective for the jobs they were built to do. A threshold alone, however, may not explain a changing operating regime or the consequence at a particular location.
Specialized analytics go deeper on one signal or workflow.
Operators may still need to bring those findings together before they can compare priorities across teams, assets, and locations. KartaSoft adds the common analytical context these approaches need to support the same decision.
Keep what works. Add missing context.
A manageable set of priorities,
scientifically backed.

|
A focused view that keeps your existing systems in place, respects engineers' authority, and connects the evidence around a defined operational decision. |
|
Your team can see how the infrastructure is behaving as conditions change, where likelihood and consequence are converging, and which items merit closer review. |
|
Each priority carries the reasons, confidence information, and supporting evidence needed for technical and governance review. |
PHYSICS-INFORMED OPERATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Built to answer difficult questions
No new sensors
KartaSoft works across data already held in operational, asset, spatial, inspection, and field systems.
Governed data learning
Physics-informed methods add engineering relationships and system behaviour to the analysis, helping make useful sense of noisy records, changing operating states, and scarce failure examples.
Clear outcomes from the start
The work starts with a defined question: which operational condition merits further review, which corridor activity deserves closer attention, or which assets should move higher in a relative-risk view?
Forward deploy experts
KartaSoft scientists and engineers develop the analysis alongside the customer's specialists.
Operational condition review | Corridor activity review | Relative asset-risk prioritization
From fragmented evidence to focused judgment
Use the data you have to make the next scientifically backed decision
No new sensors, no costly retrofits
Interpret changing conditions
Operations do not stand still. Maintenance, upgrades, reconfiguration, demand changes, and instrumentation changes all alter expected system behaviour.
KartaSoft governs baselines by operating regime, helping teams distinguish an expected transition from a condition that merits closer review.
Focus attention where consequences matter
Signal magnitude alone does not establish priority. The same condition can carry very different meaning depending on the asset, location, people, environment, service, or operations exposed.
KartaSoft brings that context together, connects related areas into Risk Islands, and provides relative-risk priorities for the relevant team. Finite engineering and field capacity can then be directed toward a smaller, more useful review set.
Make every priority reviewable
An analytical result is only useful if the people responsible for the infrastructure can examine it.
KartaSoft provides reason codes, confidence information, contributing factors, and an evidence trail behind each priority. Engineers retain judgment. Governance teams gain a clearer record of how the information was produced and considered.
The disciplines behind the output
Operational Philosophy
Four controls for first-class asset intelligence
Baseline Governance
Govern what normal means as operating conditions change, so expected behaviour does not drift without review.
Consequence Intelligence
Interpret a condition in the context of the assets, people, environment, service, and operations exposed.
Risk Islands
Connect adjacent assets, locations,or signals where elevated conditions and consequence form one operational concern.
Explainability
Show the reason codes, confidence, evidence, and analytical history behind each relative-risk priority.
Explore KartaSoft's operational philosophy
Built to stand up to rigorous review
KartaSoft does not ask a team to accept a model output on faith.
The validation begins with agreed measures and ends with evidence that technical, operational, and governance teams can examine.
Historical evaluation
Outputs are back-tested or blind-tested against known outcomes when the available data supports it.
Data limits made visible
Incomplete records affect what can be concluded. The evidence package states where information is sufficient and where uncertainty remains.
Reviewable output
Reason codes, confidence information, contributing evidence, and method notes support qualified review.
An advisory layer,
not a control system
Connect the signals.
Rank the risk.
Prioritize action.
Your alarms, operational controls, engineering processes, and field practices remain in place. KartaSoft works alongside them as an analytical advisory layer.
|
Existing SCADA, GIS, asset, inspection, ticketing, and field systems remain systems of record. |
|
Confidence and data limitations remain visible rather than being hidden behind a score. |
|
Qualified customer personnel review KartaSoft outputs and decide the response. |
|
Analytical outputs complement established safety systems, regulatory obligations, and governance frameworks. |
The operational intelligence layer empowering the backbone systems of society
Oil & Gas
With dispersed assets, changing operating conditions and high-consequence exposure, KartaSoft helps operators focus engineering attention on the risks and flow decisions that matter most.
Water & Wastewater
With aging networks, overflow risk and constrained capital, KartaSoft helps utilities prioritize operational response and renewal where service and ratepayer consequences are greatest.
Electric Utilities
With weather volatility, asset stress and rising reliability expectations, KartaSoft helps utilities combine forecasts and infrastructure context to strengthen grid resilience and planning.
Rail
Across long corridors exposed to encroachment and aging assets, KartaSoft helps rail operators focus safety, inspection and renewal resources where operational consequence is highest.
Large Landholdings
Where vast properties make continuous oversight impractical, KartaSoft improves situational awareness of land activity, access change and encroachment between site visits.
Ecosystem/Partners
As customers demand integrated and defensible infrastructure intelligence, KartaSoft helps partners extend existing services with consequence-aware analysis, evidence and decision support.
Designed to complement the way your team already works
No. KartaSoft’s physics-informed approach is designed for noisy signals, incomplete histories, rare events, and changing operating conditions. The assessment makes confidence levels and data gaps visible.
No. KartaSoft is designed to provide interpretable context, including the factors, reason codes, confidence, and consequence behind an analytical view. Engineering judgment remains central.
No. Outputs are informational and advisory. They provide additional information for consideration alongside engineering judgment, field practices, safety systems, regulatory obligations, and governance frameworks.
It produces evidence about one operational question: the available data, the analytical approach, performance against agreed measures, material limitations, and the implications for potential operational use.
Yes. KartaSoft publishes its security and data-governance position and makes supporting materials available through standard vendor review. Keep the wording “SOC 2-aligned controls” unless the documented status changes.